Competitive Call of Duty in the CIS.
Hi all. As you know, in the CIS countries Call of Duty is going through hard times at the moment. However, in my opinion, it is not deserved. Particularly competitive Call of Duty. In the West, a huge number of players play it with pleasure, but there are only one or two players in the CIS. But it’s more interesting than, for example, Counter-Strike. Maybe someone was interested in this topic, but didn’t know how to start playing, maybe someone simply didn’t know about the possibility "join in" V eSports V Call of Duty. In general, to be released soon Black Ops 4, in the absence of similar videos on Russian-language YouTube, I made a simple educational video in order to raise interest in this topic, which will show how and where to start playing competitive CoD for everyone interested, or simply interested in this series of games.
Let’s find out why Call of Duty in the CIS don’t like? I will try to dispel the reasons imposed on you.
The first is the conveyor. This https://casinolucki.com/ is the most popular argument in favor of the fact that Call of Duty, to put it mildly, is such a game. The game is currently being developed by three studios: Treyarch, Infinity Ward and SledgeHummer Games. Studios are given three years to develop each game.e. each new game in the series is made by different studios. And these games are played differently. Let’s take for example Infinite Warfare And Black Ops 3. The concepts are the same: jet packs and wall running. It would seem that take the mechanics from BO 3, make new textures and a new game is ready. No, IW feels completely different than BO 3. A prime example is MLG. When WWII came out, they stopped playing IW there, no one played it, NO ONE, everyone played and still plays BO 3, combined with WWII. WWII and BO 3 are completely different games. Do you want fast gameplay?? Play BO 3. Do you want slow, measured, even tactical gameplay?? Play WWII.
Second – no change Are you serious? Why then did the game become crap for you if you liked it before, but nothing changes in it?? CoD MW-CoD Ghosts-this is just horizontal gameplay, CoD AW is already vertical gameplay, but clearly different from BO 3 And IW. In AW you could just jump up, sharply and quickly, without running along walls or draining booster energy. BO 3 and IW added wall running and made jumping smooth with a limited amount of energy, allowing you to have more control over your movements in the air than in AW. Specialists were also added, each with their own skills, which radically transformed the gameplay. WWII brought us back to earth and removed the specialists (logically they would have looked out of place in a WWII setting). Black Ops 4 also returned to earth, but retained the specialists, making them so that each was assigned a corresponding role. Isn’t this a change?? And what dramatic changes in gameplay occurred from Bad Company 1 to Battlefield 1? You can go even deeper into the changes, for example, perks in WWII compared to previous parts, but it will be very, very long.
Third-graphics. Seriously, how blind do you have to be to not see the difference?? It’s not even funny.
Fourth (the most crazy) – no equipment and small maps. Whaaaat. Call of Duty and fell in love for infantry fighting on small maps, for fast gameplay. Your Battlefield with its own gameplay existed during the times MW 1, but for some reason M.W has become exponentially more popular. Why?
Fifth, Activision just wants to make money. But E.A holy guys. In reality, it’s their Premium in Battlefield that costs more than the Season Pass for Call of Duty. It’s EA that adds new content only for an extra penny. But in WWII there is a wonderful event system that adds new guns, new skins, new goodies, even new modes (such as the “Air Combat” mode, where you urinate on planes) to the game. And it’s completely free, anyone who just bought their game once can use it. And the same system will be in Black Ops 4. And… oh horror, in Battlefield V(which will have less content at launch than one zombie mode map in Black Ops). Who stole from whom?;)
In general, I could rant on this topic for a very, very long time. I just wanted to convey that Call of Duty is not as bad a game as they make it out to be. Have your own opinion guys, good luck.:)